Showing posts with label Forbes. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Forbes. Show all posts

Monday, September 29, 2014

Monday, September 09, 2013

SerioUS Syria or ...

Rush 'n Delay?
Not Exactly !

[Breaking* News! (update** here*)]

* during NewsNation(Hillary Clinton on Syria)
**Jane Harman on Andrea Mitchell 9-6-13

[Here is to Harm 'n Knee!]
{later from The Cycle: Fawaz Gerges here.}

Monday, February 25, 2013

Bricks and stones

no bones about it?

Too many threads.*
Still in the process of reading the links embedded and woven aknew[!]***

*2-24-13 

[a different Handy**]
[not to get a degree in Bacon but sometimes shelves are handy]
** found on one of my shelves.

***  Rhee-Marshall-Handy
In Charles Handy's The Age of Paradox,(**) there are two chapters I navigated to, but first I would say that every age is a paradox, as that is the nature of nature. Anyway, they are The Federal Idea p. 109) under Practicing the Preaching, which referenced back to the Sigmoid Curve(p. 49) under Finding the Balance.  I would like to weave in the Paradox of Choice by Bob Schwartz to determine if management of information and business is what education should be based on

Forbes Thought Of The Day
Money never starts an idea; it is the idea that starts the money.”
— William J. Cameron


[See under degree / on, (b.s.)finds "tetra+heed+run" / "Platonic+plank" = Education/Business/Government loopiness. Not to suggest nonsense or SixSigma, but a Six Edged 4Mat of dynamics and what matters and is the point, balancing change and individual freedoms.  (Platonic Platforming and Planks Constant?)]

Not to suggest a tipping of the tetrahedron, or BEG the work of N-title meants but which comes first? Business/Education/Government slash results or causes and affects of design?

Friday, February 15, 2013

HAPPY V-DAY!

to conintue *
the Hiatus **
of sorts.

* (anachronism)
OW**!

Forbes Thought Of The Day

Vision is the art of seeing things invisible.”
— Jonathan Swift

** further OW.(or EW?)

[UPDATE: D-Day My apologies to Marco Rubio and Beevis, I am not that familiar with the latter character's nature but I believe the former is not going for laughs, water bottle aside.  I also don't know if I besmirched the character of Butthead by comparing him to Rand Paul, and I don't really know which of the two SOTU responses are further from having a grasp of nature or economics. 

Thursday, May 31, 2012

Bring It On!

Speaking of preemptive...it was only a thought.  But one missed by this author who takes President Obama to task in The End of the Post-9/11 World.  That being, with the obstructionism (update 6-4) the Republicans bring to the economy, what could they bring to national defense or foreign policy?  Actually the missing thought is the NDAA and how hard it is to change laws given the success he had on Gitmo and his budget and jobs act, and it seems the author missed it too. The only question should be who will be in the legislature to change our laws, and who will be the executive until they do. 

IT IS ON....
the table.


* in his own words(WH?)
[Speaking of War on Characterizations.(NewsNation) Deval Bane.]
[UPDATE on forks ?  ? ? ]
[Speaking of share 'n angle, Martin Bashir w/Alter 'n Christie on two Americas.
If Bain=Solyndra then Edwards=Wisconsin.  Not! DR out.(Not to mention Pap on Thom Hartmann.)
Don't Ask, Don't Tell, MRS W. Woe Wae! War Against Ethics.]

[6-1-12 Long Story Short? Du'oh!(?)!]


**acronym anomoly (for pun sake)
(crossing threshold not sterling qualification)